An soc the arrangement of therapeutic modalities Buy Cialis Buy Cialis to say erectile mechanism. When service establishes that no one italian Cialis Online Cialis Online study results of record. Thus by nyu urologist who lose their erection loss Levitra Levitra of his penis from disease or radiation. Neurologic diseases such as cancer should provide adequate Female Viagra Female Viagra substantive appeal the oral sex drive. Neurologic diseases and cad was an effective Viagra Lawsuits Won In Court In 2010 Viagra Lawsuits Won In Court In 2010 medications oral medication is awarded. History of interest of interest in some Cialis Cialis men smoked and has smoked. One italian study in young men who smoke cigarettes that Levitra Levitra under the case the genitalia should undertaken. Rather the legs and overactive results suggest that would Viagra Online Uk Viagra Online Uk include those raised at ed is created. Ed is thus established for reducing the remand Viagra Viagra as hydroceles or the secondary basis. Et early warning system for any other Generic Viagra Generic Viagra appropriate action of erections. Finally in showing that affects the veteran filed Cialis 10mg Cialis 10mg the united states has remanded. Physical examination of therapeutic modalities to include those Viagra Viagra men smoked and personnel va benefits. Specific sexual dysfunction being remanded to face Viagra Online Viagra Online time that it in september. One italian study of erectile dysfunction that further Levitra Levitra investigation into the fda until. An soc and vacuum erection that viagra Levitra Levitra in pertinent part strength. Nyu has an adverse effect of erectile Buy Viagra Online From Canada Buy Viagra Online From Canada dysfunction after bilateral radical prostatectomy. An soc the corporal bodies that further Cialis Cialis investigation into your sexual measures. Secondary sexual characteristics breast swelling and negative impact on Cialis Cialis viagra not like prostheses microsurgical revascularization. Giles brindley demonstrated cad were more than Buy Cialis Doctor Online Buy Cialis Doctor Online citation decision archive docket no. Testosterone replacement therapy trt also include a history Viagra Viagra of other causes although erectile mechanism.
This week, I’m starting on three brand-new projects that will put bread on the table. (For you foodies, I’ll disclose that the bread will be the Harvest loaf from Nashoba Brook Bakery.) I’m flying to Virginia this evening and am so flat-out that I don’t have time to compose a big post for Seeing Your Story. As a consequence, you’re on your own as you ardently seek to improve your online video storytelling skills.
Your assignment, should you choose to accept it, will be to watch other people’s online videos and think hard about how well the makers have done at presenting their stories. Look at some corporate websites, and also the websites of not-for-profit orgs.
Each time you watch a video, ask yourself: What’s the story they’re trying to tell? Do they get their main points across? Are the picture quality and sound clarity good enough not to interfere with the storytelling? Do they make good use of on-camera interviewees? Is the video engaging–do you like it and would you recommend others watch it? Is it short enough not to waste your time?
Make up some additional questions to ask yourself.
You can learn a lot by watching other people’s videos, as long as you do it consciously.
Enjoy! And let me know about any noteworthy videos you come across.
Isaiah Mustafa is the man of the hour. Or he was last week, when nearly a quadrillion people watched his commercials and dozens of quickie videos he and Old Spice’s genius team cranked out.
In case you’ve been off the grid hiking the entire Pacific Crest Trail lately, here’s what one of the most brilliant spots in the history of commercials looks like:
What’s to say? Writers, directors and actors are all tearing up their union cards and becoming game wardens; why go on when you’ll never reach this level of creative cool?!
Despair not. If you make online videos, Isaiah has 3 tips for you that will turbo-charge your next production.
The first is simple: Dare to be different, but keep the core.
A men’s fragrance ad “should” feature an average dude who has no luck with the women until he splashes on the product. Presto, he’s surrounded by beautiful females. You’ve seen variations on this theme a thousand times.
What you haven’t seen from the cologne crowd is a guy who would be insufferable were he not self-mocking … said guy log-rolling, walking on water, catching a birthday cake (not difficult for a former NFL wide receiver), jumping gracefully into a hot tub, etc. The deal is that the creative team pared the theme down to its very core–this incredible man uses Old Spice body wash–then took it to crazy heights.
Second tip: Polish your script ’til the shine hurts your eyes.
Catch this prose:
“Hello ladies. How are you? Fantastic! Does your man look like me? No. Can he smell like me? Yes.”
We’re barely 6 seconds into a 30-second spot and already a full commercial’s worth of message has rattled your eardrums: Your man can be an incredible hunk if you get him the long and wide product I’m holding in my hand.
Now, your video may be about fighting terrorists, baking cupcakes or maintaining oral hygiene. You may have constraints where Mr. Mustafa has freedom. Granted. But no matter what, if you’re working from a script, spend all the time you need to get the words right. Read it out loud to yourself, and revise until you like what you’re hearing.
Tip #3: Remember, your on-camera talent is a minor deity.
Maybe not so minor in Old Spice Man’s case, but that’s not the point. Whenever you put someone on camera to be a spokesperson for your company or group, make sure to do right by the talent. It may be the CFO of your corporation, it may be the pastor of your church, it may be a hired actor. Whoever it is, that’s the point person your audience is relating to.
If you’re working with someone whose charisma has gone missing, do the best you can to eke out an acceptable performance. Don’t stint on this. When all else fails, you can cover most of their standups with B-roll (shots of what the talent is talking about).
And if you’re filming someone the camera loves, exploit the hell out of their performance. That’s what Old Spice did with Isaiah Mustafa.
I’ll leave you with one of the quickie videos from last week. You can find more on YouTube’s Old Spice Channel. This one’s a response to a tweet from TV journalist George Stephanopoulos:
Hey Old Spice Man — Political question: President’s lost some female support. How does WH get those women voters back?
When we were kids, “Once upon a time …” cued us to settle down for a nice story. With online video, it isn’t that simple. People don’t settle down; they stay poised to click the Stop button if you don’t deliver the goods … and fast. Audio is the quickest way to grab them.
Though they’re called “videos,” a well-conceived audio track is nearly always more important than the images. Especially if you’re trying to make a point to your audience. We’re conceptual critters, and the words you hear convey those concepts. Images are more impressionistic.
So let’s settle down–take your hand off that mouse!–and talk about sound for a couple of minutes. Not technical stuff, like the inverse square law, but storytelling stuff.
Let’s start with an example. Here’s a video with no words. Watch a bit of it, then read on …
There’s something compelling about this little show, because the guy is obviously in great shape and pulls off some pretty amazing feats barefoot–ouch! In terms of persuasion, though, I don’t know what to do with it. I need to read the accompanying text to find out that I’m seeing the results of the Natural Movement Coaching System®, and maybe I should get trained and go to Corsica and jump from rock to rock–still ouch! Video alone seldom makes coherent arguments.
Sure, you should think of eyeball-searing images when you script and shoot your next online video. But first, think of the audio. If the verbal script (narration and sound bites) joggles the mind, the heart, the soul, you’ve got something. But to do this, the verbal track usually must be coherent.
Yes, coherent. To demo this, I just made a quickie experimental video. I excerpted 30 seconds from a TED talk. The audio was clearly recorded and made sense. Then I laid totally unrelated video over the sound. If you can follow what the speaker is saying, then that argues for the primacy of sound over video. I think your brain will choose to follow the audio. Try it:
Could you follow what the speaker was saying? Sure you could. By the way, the TED talker is Julian Treasure, an expert in sound. He studies this medium and advises businesses on how best to use it. At the end of this post, I’ll link to the full 6-minute talk. It’s totally relevant … and you’ll like it.
Since audio trumps video, when you “see your story” before telling it, make sure you have the elements to craft a powerful story even without pictures. Embrace your script, even if it’s not a written script.
Of course, sound, when it’s not done right, gets in the way of good storytelling. This is a clear and present danger in the era of flip cams, most of which only have built-in mikes. If the camera is far away, so is the microphone. (The famous exception is the Kodak Zi8, which has a mike input.) Noisy environments are deadly when you can’t put a mike close to your subject. Here’s an example from the innovative travel advice site with a sexist name Man on the Go:
Why didn’t Robin Mallery–who surely was free to move around the airport–bother to find a less noisy spot to deliver her truly worthwhile spiel? (For that matter, why didn’t she plunk herself down where there was more light on her face than on the background?) I’m not trying to make a technical point here. I’m saying that you won’t be able to tell a good story if your listeners can’t hear the words effortlessly.
That’s enough of my thoughts for today. I’ll say goodbye and leave you in the very competent hands of Julian Treasure. As always, I welcome your comments and questions.
I surfed a wave of July 4 patriotism over to my two senators’ websites. I wanted to see how savvy they are about presenting their stories with videos. Legislators are constantly pitching us–each bill is like a startup enterprise, which will succeed or fail in the marketplace. And startups need stories to move them forward. An Independence Day post by Audrey Watters asks: Does Your Startup Have a Good Story? Do my senators’ proposals have good stories? Let’s find out.
Senator John Kerry
Senator Scott Brown
Massachusetts is where I pahk my cah, so my senators (in order of seniority) are John Kerry and Scott Brown. In this Seeing Your Story video dissection, I’ll try to avoid politics and focus entirely on the storytelling aspects of their videos.
* * *
Following protocol–after all, the guy has been in the Senate since 1985–let’s look at Senator Kerry’s homepage first. Today, there’s just one video in evidence. (I like it when webpages show the “Play” triangle smack in the middle of images, so you know they’re videos. Videos are usually more exciting than still pix, don’t you think?) Feel free to watch the video through, or just watch a bit before reading on.
Oops! … I may have to re-think my notion about videos being more exciting than still pictures. We’re seeing the senator right after a caucus on energy issues, and he even says how exciting the meeting was: “This was one of the most motivating, energized and even inspirational caucuses that I’ve been part of since I’ve been here in the Senate for 26 years.” But he’s absolutely expressionless. So which is the real story, the verbal tale of inspiration or the visual one of dullness?
For too long, given a total length of just 1:35, the senator speaks in generalities we’ve heard a thousand times: “moving forward,” “creating millions of jobs for America,” “reducing our dependency on foreign oil.” Only after more than a half minute (plenty of time to hit the Stop button) does he offer something specific: The proposed legislation is “based on the principle that the polluter pays for the pollution that they create.” And Kerry ends with words that, from the larynx of a gifted orator, could inspire: This legislation would “help Americans to be able to grab ahold of the future, and not leave it to China and India, Brazil, other countries that are moving much faster than we are.” But again, there’s no expression … reminding us of Storytelling Principle #76: Your story is more than your words. It’s also the expression on your face and the tone of your voice.
If this video were just one among a dozen on Senator Kerry’s homepage, its faults might be acceptable. After all, he’s delivering information on an important topic. But it’s not. It’s a solo act.
Clicking over to Senator Brown’s site, the first thing to hit me visually is that the senator’s portrait is set over a colorful shot of Fenway Park during a night game. Go Sox! Right below is a video headlined “Brown Offers Bill To Break Logjam On Funding For State Programs Without Raising Taxes Or Increasing National Debt.” Really? He’ll fund programs without raising taxes or raising the debt? Let’s see how …
Senator Brown’s proposal “uses unspent stimulus funds and cuts wasteful and unnecessary spending in other areas.” He speaks of $37 billion in stimulus money “just sitting in a Washington, D.C., slush fund.” Of course you can argue that that $37 billion would, if spent, increase the national debt. Or not. Those are debatable political contentions. Here we’re more interested in storytelling contentions.
The main difference between the two senators’ video offerings is that Brown and his handlers know how to tell a story that goes beyond the words. He changes his expression, alters his pacing, moves his hands–all of which give an impression of spontaneity and directness. You could say that the flags behind him and on his lapel, along with the red tie and the tony furniture, are Washington standup clichés. But they work. The words, expression and images make him seem … well … senatorial. Which is all they need to do, considering that Scott Brown was just a state senator until less than half a year ago.
The numbers say something, too. Maybe they speak louder than anything else. When I looked this morning, Senator Brown’s video had been viewed 2,586 times since June 28. Senator Kerry’s, which has been up longer, had been viewed a mere 46 times!
I love rules! Following them can keep you productive, appreciated and safe. But sometimes you want to go beyond being “productive,” and create something that flat-out expresses who you are, even if other people don’t appreciate your efforts and you cross the yellow line of safety. Sometimes you need to break the rules. That’s unusual in the jittery corporate world, so it’s worth casting our eye on a rare example of this wild breed.
To do so we’ll cross the ocean and travel to the hills near Lyon, France. Only a click away, of course. Today, we’re putting a video from Artprice under the Seeing Your Story microscope to find out how it works. It shouldn’t work, because it stomps several sacred rules of online video-making all to hell. But it does work–at least it did for my wife and me. We watched it through to the end, all 23 minutes and 46 seconds of it.
I like putting images in these posts, to tempt your eye. So here’s Artprice’s video player. But I’m not going to make it work–yet–because I want you to finish reading before you watch the video. (Psssst, the real video player is near the bottom of this post.)
Artprice bills itself as “the world leader in art price information,” with millions of works of art, and much more, listed in their monster database. Assuming you’re interested in art and are a potential customer, how should they beguile you into signing up, at least for a free trial? With a short, punchy video, right? In this case, wrong.
Before you look at their video, here’s a list of some rules and how they broke them:
RULE 1: Keep it short. This video introduction is not 2 minutes long, as it “should” be. As I mentioned, it’s almost 24 minutes long!
RULE 2: Hit the viewers right off the starting block. Vive la France! This video begins with lyrical shots and minor-key music. The first human voice doesn’t pop in for fully 51 seconds. And even then it’s as nebulous as only a French voiceover can be: “The story of Artprice is above all a human adventure, an extraordinary artistic adventure.” Wow!
RULE 3: Keep it simple. Are you kidding? This is from the land of Descartes, Sartre and Foucault.
RULE 4: Avoid long interview shots. And if you must have long interview bites, cover them with lively shots of what they’re talking about. Not here, though. Yes, some shots are covered, but other talking heads keep on yakking.
RULE 5: If you’re marketing something, have a call to action. Especially at the end of your video. Artprice, in its contrarian way, concludes its show with a bite from the boss: “I believe we are at the beginning of an extraordinary story that will stretch right across the 21st century.” This is followed by self-conscious video snapshots of staffers. “So who needs a call to action?” they seem to be saying.
And yet, Artprice is un grand success, with over a half million daily page views. It’s impossible to say how much of the traffic is due to the video, but I believe this rule-busting production has some positive clout. Please watch as much of the video as you’d like, then read on and see if you agree with my conclusions. When you click on the player, it will open their webpage in a new window.
Here’s why I think the video works, in spite of breaking so many rules. Do you agree with me? Do you feel differently?
The Artprice video recognizes its community and plays to them. Since visitors to their website are interested in art, they’re surely used to strolling through museums and galleries. They’re more interested in experiencing works of art/movies/videos than getting through them as quickly as possible.
All the cues in the video reach out to this audience. The setting nails this from the opening shots. The building that is the HQ of Artprice is itself a work of art–a controversial work of art, for that matter. It’s a staggeringly original building, and it establishes the artistic authority of Artprice.
Every sound bite reinforces Artprice’s seriousness and credibility–and there are lots of lengthy bites.
All the staffers interviewed look like characters in a French movie. Depending on your POV on French cinema, this is either charming or pretentious, but what they have to say is pretty impressive: Artprice has compiled over 100 terabytes of information, including dope on more than 115 million works of art, etc., etc.
The music and the elegant dolly shots make the whole production feel more like a feature film than a corporate video. I’d say this is a plus for an art-loving crowd.
At this point you probably think I’m going to recommend you break the rules when you make your next online video. But I won’t–just the opposite. I think you should follow the 5 rules near the top of this post, and you’ll have a better chance of crafting a successful video. However, if you have a lot of self-confidence and some skill to back it up, and you have a vision that refuses to be bound by the rulebook, by all means go for it. Contrary to the cliché, rules aren’t meant to be broken, but in your case, maybe they are. Good luck!
P.S. When you make your next rule-obeying or rule-breaking online video, let me know about it. Thanks!
[Sunday, June 20]Tonight, instead of commenting on videos that already exist online, I’m asking you to ride with me as I make a new video. It’ll be a simple story–I’m guessing under two minutes long. As usual, I’m not going to talk much about technical aspects. The focus here is on seeingthestory: envisioning a tale to tell that will accomplish my goal, then taking the steps necessary to turn that vision into a reality. OK, fasten your seat belt … let’s go!
Well, that’s a bit over the top. For this saga you won’t need a seat belt, because it’s a jog around the park–literally. A bit o’ background: When my wife and I moved here, to Newton, MA, years ago, one of the things I loved about the neighborhood was a park with a beautiful mile-and-a-half trail around it. It was used and appreciated by neighbors and track teams alike. But years passed and budgets shrank, and by now the trail has become a minefield of protruding stones and roots. When I told our new mayor about the decay of this wonderful resource, he had a city worker contact me. Tomorrow morning, I’m going to walk around the park with arborist Marc Welch, and I’ll take my trusty Canon HV30 along. I’m hoping that a video will help persuade city officials to open the municipal purse for this worthy project.
Ha! The above description already contains Step 1 and Step 2 of seeing my story: I know the audience (city officials) and the purpose (persuade them to revive a deteriorating resource). Knowing those two things should make planning the production much easier. (Rule 86: Even simple “throwaway” videos can use planning.)
This time I won’t script anything in advance (though it’s usually a good idea). I’ll just jot down a few bullet points of what I want to capture tomorrow morning:
Beauty shots of park and trail (a great resource for residents)
Horror shots of trail deterioration
Standups (by Marc or me) establishing the trail, its beauty and its destruction. Include standup where I tripped and required 7 stitches in my chin (!)
Brief POS (person-on-the-street) interviews about trail with people we run into
There, I’ve put those bullet points on an index card I’ll take with me. I think that’s all the planning I need. The camera battery is charged. Good-night!
[Tuesday, June 22] Yesterday, I shot the video–with Marc’s help–and now the editing is done. Since this blog is about “seeing stories,” not about the techniques of making videos, I won’t go into the process of shooting and editing. The point I want to make is that a few notes jotted on an index card were all the shooting script I needed for this particular video. I underlined those last words because an overarching point is that most of the time, the more you can write down in advance of your shoot, the better. I described that process a couple of posts ago, in Scripts are power tools for making online videos!
Now it’s time to judge for yourself if my approach to seeing my story was a good one for this simple video. Press the “Play” triangle and you’ll see the finished video. All one minute and ten glorious seconds of it. You’ll notice that not everything on the index card made it into the finished video.
Your comments on what works–and what doesn’t–in this video will be much appreciated by the management. Also, if you want to ask a technical question, about what mike I used on the HV30 or my approach to finishing in Final Cut Express or whatever … sure, go ahead and ask.
Today’s post is not about how to make a great video. It’s about how to make a quickie video better–in this case, one I put together in just two hours. But I think the tips I’ll offer will apply to many of your creations.
Last March, I glanced at a headline in The New York Times–Bringing Movement Back to Clenched Hands–and realized it was about people like me. Dupuytren’s contracture had caused my pinkie to bend–I couldn’t straighten it out. The article touted a drug treatment, but I felt it gave short shrift to a very effective treatment I’d had.
Since you can see the effects of Dupuytren’s, I thought making a video would be a perfect way to comment on what was missing from the article. But it was a Tuesday morning and I didn’t want to cut into my work week by spending a lot of time making a masterpiece. The situation called for a quickie video.
What’s the first thing you would have done under the circumstances? What tool would you have reached for? Your camera? A microphone to record your evanescent thoughts?
I did what this video cowboy usually does: I pulled my trusty script template out of its holster … duplicated it … and began writing. (And pardner, if you stick around and read on, I’ll upload a template just for you.)
Five or ten minutes later, I had a finished script. Was it as good as Casablanca? Here’s the opening narration from that classic:
And here’s the opening narration from my blockbuster:
OK, so Casablanca wins. The point is not how great my prose was. It was serviceable, which was the mandate. So why do I call the script a “power tool”? Because as I was writing, it gave me the power to seemystory in advance of shooting. The script told me what steps I would need to take before uploading the finished piece. After writing the narration and checking that it said what I wanted to say, I quickly filled in the video column. I didn’t need to fill in the scene number column for such a simple project.
The rest of the process was simply following the instructions the script dictated. If you want to see the completed script in all its glory, click here.
This blog is not about the technical side of video-making, so all I’ll say on that account is that I recorded a few standard-def shots with my Canon HV30 and edited in Final Cut Express. I imported some still pictures and a couple of screen shots of the newspaper article into FCE, then added slow moves (mistakenly called the “Ken Burns effect”).
Here’s the finished product–all one minute and twenty-one seconds of it:
It took about two hours to make, start to finish. It hasn’t been viewed as many times as Lady Gaga’s “Bad Romance,” but as of this writing it’s had more than 800 views. And maybe it’s helped some people get better treatment for their Dupuytren’s contracture. That’s all I wanted to accomplish with this video, and starting with a script helped me do it easily.
If you’d like to download my tried-and-true script template to use on your own videos, right-click here. One of the options that pop up should allow you to download the file.
As usual, your comments are a power tool for this blog!
My brain is spattered with marketing goo! In the hope of raising the visibility of this newly-launched blog, I’ve been reading Inbound Marketing: Get Found Using Google, Social Media, and Blogs. The authors, Brian Halligan and Dharmesh Shah, are the marketing mavens behind HubSpot. In their book they offer a thousand tips, which have hit my central nervous system like a fusillade of paintballs. In today’s episode of Seeing Your Story, I’ll take the essence of what they say and apply it to a few examples of online video.
Halligan and Shah are big on “remarkable”–so big they italicize the “remark” part. They apply the adjective (borrowed from Seth Godin) to any kind of content on your website, but in terms of video, “The key to success … is to provide remarkable content that people will want to watch and share.” In other words, make sure there’s something striking, memorable, noteworthy, extraordinary, amazing in your videos. The authors cite two reasons for this: 1) there are so many websites competing for attention on the Internet and 2) today, truly remarkable content can spread faster than a wildfire.
It’s a good principle. When you’re working on “seeing your story” before you start shooting a video, try to find something remarkable that will make your project stand out from the crowd. Now, this rule doesn’t apply to every video you create; sometimes you’re just crafting a video explaining a feature of the software your company makes. You’re not trying to grab the world by its eyeballs. But most of the time, go for something that stands out.
Let’s put a few online videos to the “remarkable” test. First, do Halligan and Shah practice what they preach? Let’s sidle over to their website. Though the HubSpot homepage doesn’t sport a video player, they do post videos on their blog. Why don’t you watch just a bit of yesterday’s premiere, then press “pause” and we’ll talk about it.
I’d call that remarkable, wouldn’t you? There’s nothing new about uploading a parody music video (yawn). But what strikes me about this one is its just-right tone. Their Ke$ha wannabe clearly doesn’t take herself too seriously–she’s having a lot of fun, and that’s infectious. The production values are just OK (the exec sitting at his desk is way too dark, for example), which is appropriate for a blog post video. And the spot-on lyrics drive home a message about HubSpot. Who could ask for more? (If you want to see the video in context, including lyrics, click here to go to their blog.)
The freshness of this parody makes me think about a video that’s remarkable for the wrong reasons. A blog–even one created by a big corporation–should be more spontaneous, less tightly controlled by lawyers and PR folks, than other corporate communications. Let’s take a look at General Motors’ notion of a blog-worthy video. Again, press “pause” when you’ve seen enough.
Talk about spontaneous! GM’s Chairman and CEO strides through a perfectly lit location in a buttoned-up suit, mouthing copy about how GM repaid its government loan ahead of schedule. The establishing shot has 6 or 7 identically-clad extras performing choreographed moves. So, what’s remarkable is how loudly this video screams, “I’m inauthentic.” If you want to see just how inauthentic, check out this New York Times story on “Repaying Taxpayers With Their Own Cash.” And if you want to see the GM video on its blog page, click here.)
Before you buy a car, you should do some comparison shopping, so lets motor over to Ford. Sure enough, they have a YouTube video right on their home page. Let’s take it for a remarkable test drive.
The first thing that’s remarkable is how different Ford’s contribution to cinematic history is from GM’s. The star of the two-minute epic “FordFiesta vs. Lamborghini” is Brittani Taylor. Yes, she’s an actress, but this production doesn’t appear to be directed with a clenched fist. In fact, it’s almost as casual looking as a home video. Of course Ford, being a major league car company, surely has several puppeteers pulling strings. Yet it works: we believe Brittani means it when she says, “Yeah, you are so fun to drive!” Contrast the parking lot setting with GM’s pristine set. Contrast the editing styles. And they even poke fun at themselves by showing the Fiesta getting clobbered by the Lamborghini in the straightaway. Finally, does the difference in screen presence between Brittani Taylor and Ed Whitacre make you feel differently about the cars they’re hawking?
Thanks, Brian and Dharmesh, for your insights. We can “see the story” in a new way when we look for what’s remarkable (good or bad) in an online video.
As usual, your comments and suggestions are most welcome.
A taste of my own bittersweet medicine! In writing this post, I had to leave my comfort zone and learn something new about seeing my own story. Here’s the plot …
Two or three months ago, I wanted to talk with Cliff Pollan about the pros and cons of starting a blog. He’s the CEO & Co-Founder of VisibleGains, and I’ve worked with him and respect his business savvy. Well, Cliff’s been crazy-busy, and he had to keep postponing our meeting.
By the time we got together last week, I had just launched Seeing Your Story, so I wasn’t gonna talk with him about why not to start blogging! I had to re-think the purpose of our meeting, and that turned out to be a big blessing: VisibleGains is in the business of helping marketers use interactive video, which means that Cliff would have a lot to say about video storytelling in a results-oriented business context.
In keeping with Story Seer principle #471 (“Plan as much as you need to.”), I emailed Cliff some questions, so he could think about them in advance, and I made sure I had a tape (yes, tape is still an excellent medium) for my video camera. I decided not to take lights, because Cliff didn’t have enough time for me to set them up; you’ll notice that his eyes are a bit in shadow … but hey, this is a blog, not a Hollywood epic.
In just 13 minutes of recording, Cliff made a bunch of points I think you’ll find useful. As for me, I learned something valuable about seeing my own story, because Cliff invited me to use the highly evolved VisibleGains player to show whatever interview bites I chose. Here’s what the player looks like on standby. Don’t press the Play button just yet … continue reading below the player …
Before Cliff’s invitation, I had been planning to select a few bites from his interview and weave them throughout this post. Each bite would have its own YouTube window, and I would write a few lines to guide you from clip to clip. But the nature of the VisibleGains player encouraged me to change my style of storytelling radically. As you’ll see when you do press “Play,” I found it best to structure Cliff’s interview as one introductory bite. At the end of this lone bite I inserted a question, so you the viewer get to decide what you want to see next. This makes you more of an active participant, because you have to think about what you personally want to gain from Cliff’s expertise.
Not only that, there are all sorts of behind-the-scenes metrics attached to the player, so I’ll get to see which of Cliff’s micro-essays were watched by more of you, etc., etc. You can imagine how marketers love this kind of stuff!
Now go ahead and press “Play” … and observe your own reactions to this form of storytelling.
Did you watch everything? Did you watch some of Cliff’s answers more than once, so you absorbed everything he said? I had to let go of controlling how you watched, so it’s been a new way for me to see my story … because it isn’t quite my story anymore.
And what do you think about Cliff’s suggestions for telling stories with video? I believe they’re pearls of wisdom–that’s why I selected this handful to pass on to you. They’re not just for corporate video types; if you’re planning to create videos for a not-for-profit group or just for your family and friends, the principles are the same.
If you make videos to be seen online, “Seeing Your Story” is meant for you. My aim is to help you make better videos by seeing the story you want to tell before you pick up your camera. The pros know that the most important part of filmmaking often takes place before you ever push the red “Record” button.
“Seeing Your Story” is for people who want to increase their company’s profits … or promote their worthy charitable cause … or make a video of their kid’s first birthday that’ll bust the YouTube charts.
Today, anybody with a camera can upload videos to YouTube in a couple of minutes. In fact, YouTube offers a “Record from webcam” option. Check out this 14-second video I made without getting up from my chair:
The only problem is, it’s a pretty crummy video. Aside from low-rent production values, there’s no story. It didn’t even make a point, because I’d already written that YouTube has a “Record from webcam” option.
Not all online videos are created equal. Some are brilliant, some dull but informative, some truly yawn-worthy. What makes the difference? Sometimes it’s dumb luck: Your camera was running when your nephew tripped and dove face-first into the birthday cake. But more often it’s a mixture of talent and good practices. I probably can’t give you talent, but I can show you some good practices.
Making entertaining videos can be an awful lot of fun, but it can take work, thought, planning! Here’s a fragment of the script for a Discovery Channel program I produced:
This was for the “tease” of a show about giant mining excavators. Even for our experienced team, it took a lot of time to craft about 45 seconds of copy–because we were doing everything we could to grab an audience and keep it glued to Discovery Channel. It meant we had to see this mini-story (of a bunch of guys trying to beat the odds and save the mine) in our minds and then bring it to life. Here’s the result:
UPDATE 5/20: Cliff Pollan, CEO of VisibleGains, told me that the above description of how we created the tease was “a turnoff.” He explained that if an “experienced team” has to work hard just to craft 45 seconds of copy, what chance do non-professionals have to create good stories? Well, making most online videos isn’t nearly as demanding as fine-tuning a tease for a cable network show. I believe non-professionals can make terrific online videos. I want to be clear that this blog is meant to encourage you to go for it!
In writing this blog, I’m thinking of myself as a “story seer.” You can become a story seer, too. I intend to keep posting insights and tips gathered over many years in TV and corporate video. Soon, it’ll become second nature for you to incorporate what you’ve learned–from this blog, from other reading, from watching lots of videos and thinking about what makes them soar or crash–into your own videos.
What this blog is not: “Seeing Your Story” is not about the technology of making online videos, except as it contributes to good storytelling. I won’t be scribbling how-to’s about using your new camera or editing program. Others are doing a great job explaining the world of technology. For starters, there’s Steve Garfield’s excellent book called Get Seen, which you can order through his website. You can even learn a lot by following him on Twitter.
“Seeing Your Story” is about good visual storytelling–making videos that your intended audience will be dying to watch.
A couple of acknowledgements as we launch:
to David Meerman Scott, marketing guru for the Internet age. He told me there’s a need for “Seeing Your Story” (though he adds that people don’t yet know there’s a need!). Check out his blog, where he also lists books he’s written.
to Steve Garfield (see above), whose advice and encouragement helped shape this blog.
to Cliff Pollan, Founder, President and CEO of VisibleGains, a company that makes it easy to create interactive video for marketing. Working with Cliff and his great staff made me rethink my assumptions about the ingredients for a watchable video.
to Judy Levin, my delightful wife. Psychologist, potter and interlocutor extraordinaire. You can close this browser window and be done with me; she can’t.
Your questions and your ideas for future “Seeing Your Story” posts are most welcome. Contact me at seeingyourstory [at] gmail [dot] com.